The transfer interaction analysis
group of functions within PSS™MUST were developed for evaluating
the impact of parallel transfers on the study transfer FCITC limits.
These functions provide the answer to the commonly asked question,
How do surrounding system transfers affect transfer limits?
PSS™MUST has a large variety
of functions for transfer sensitivity analysis and reports, but
the starting point for all types of analyses is the analysis of
the impact on the specified study transfer FCITC for a change
in a single parallel transfer.
Before performing a transfer sensitivity
study, the user must specify a study transfer and compute the
study transfer FCITC determined by the most restrictive constraint.
When a change in the parallel transfer changes the flow on the
most restrictive monitored element (branch or interface), the
study transfer FCITC limits will also change. If a parallel transfer
decreases the flow on the limiting element, the FCITC limits will
increase. If a parallel transfer increases the flow on the limiting
element, then FCITC limits will decrease.
It is possible to use study and
parallel transfer network sensitivities (OTDF factors) to derive
the Parallel Transfer Response Factor (PTRF). This factor is the
ratio of change in study transfer FCITC to the change in parallel
transfer. The PTRF can be computed by using the study and parallel
transfer network sensitivities (OTDF factors).
As a result of using a linearized
load flow model, all transfer sensitivity reports describe a piece-wise
linear concave function. It is a concave function because every
new more restrictive segment has a smaller or increasingly negative
PTRF value.
Transfer sensitivity analysis provides
answers to the following questions:
What constraints can be the most limiting at the different
parallel transfer levels?
At what parallel transfer level does a new constraint become
the most restrictive?
What are the PTRF values for the most restrictive constraint?
In most cases, there are not more
than two or three most restrictive constraints within a relatively
large range of change in parallel transfer. If there is only one
limiting constraint, a user can use the linear extrapolation to
identify FCITC at different parallel transfers levels using the
PTRF value.
The transfer sensitivity analysis
also provides reports on flows and PTDF, LODF, and
OTDF factors for the most restrictive constraints.
All these reports show how the study
transfer FCITC changes with parallel transfer changes. At every
parallel transfer level, a study transfer FCITC is determined
by the most restrictive contingency/monitored element pair for
the selected study transfer. Thus, to create a transfer sensitivity
report with respect to the second limiting constraint, the user
must exclude the first most limiting constraint using function
EXCLUDE.
Under some conditions, the FCITC
report might contain negative FCITC values. PSS™MUST will
not generate summary and detailed reports for this condition.
On MS Excel charts, PSS™aMUST stops plotting if FCITC reaches
zero.
Multiple study transfer sensitivity
reports provide a convenient way to identify how one additional
transaction can impact a whole group of study transfers. These
reports are useful for operational applications (OASIS posting)
where a transmission provider wants to adjust the posted interface
limits based on an additional transmission service reservation
or schedule.
There are two basic types of reports
providing different levels of detail:
An analysis chart shows that at
the parallel transfer level 1820 MW, FCITC for all study transfers
decrease to zero simultaneously. This happens only if the parallel
transfer causes an overload by itself independent of the study
transfer levels.
A summary table provides a simple
and convenient solution for updating FCITC values in the operation
environment. This type of table can be created for every single
parallel transfer of interest and should be recomputed when schedule
changes if there are study transfers with multisegment FCITC curves.
In general, the simultaneous impact
of two or more parallel transfers on the study transfer FCITC
cannot be obtained directly. The constraining contingency/limiting
element pairs may be for different parallel transfers. In that
case, the impacts of individual parallel transfers on FCITC limits
cannot be added to obtain the total simultaneous impact on the
study transfer. However, such superposition is possible to the
left of the first inflection points of all the curves shown. For
this range of parallel transfers, the constraining contingency/monitored
element pair is the same pair that determines the nominal study
transfer FCITC when all parallel transfers are zero.
Multiple parallel transfer reports
on selected study transfers can be very useful to identify potential
parallel transactions that may have a significant impact on the
selected study transfer.